Difference between revisions of "Rational Theist Matt"
imported>Callzter |
imported>Callzter m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Basic Description == | == Basic Description == | ||
{{Member|image1 = Screenshot (159).png|gender = Male|positions/opinions = Variable|main_debating_focus = Atheists of all kind|skills = Being a grumpy old fart}} | {{Member|image1 = Screenshot (159).png|gender = Male|positions/opinions = Variable|main_debating_focus = Atheists of all kind|skills = Being a grumpy old fart}}Bell, or "Bellend" as the Brits call him, is a cantankerous old fart from Scotland that relishes in destroying conversations for the sake of his own amusement. He's recently attained a remedial level of knowledge in philosophy to which he uses as a bludgeoning tool in discussions. Bell relies almost exclusively on the Kalam Cosmological Argument yet is unable to sufficiently connect it to the Christian god. This may be why he's now changed his theological position to somewhat of a nondescript theist. | ||
Bell, or "Bellend" as the Brits call him, is a cantankerous old fart from Scotland that relishes in destroying conversations for the sake of his own amusement. He's recently attained a remedial level of knowledge in philosophy to which he uses as a bludgeoning tool in discussions. Bell relies almost exclusively on the Kalam Cosmological Argument yet is unable to sufficiently connect it to the Christian god. This may be why he's now changed his theological position to somewhat of a nondescript theist. | |||
Revision as of 00:29, 22 June 2017
Basic Description
<infobox>
<title source="title1"> <default>Rational Theist Matt</default> </title> <image source="image1">
</image> <group> <header>Information</header> <label>Gender</label> <label>Scientific Name</label> <label>Positions</label> <label>Debating Against</label> <label>Skills</label> <label>Links</label> </group> </infobox> Bell, or "Bellend" as the Brits call him, is a cantankerous old fart from Scotland that relishes in destroying conversations for the sake of his own amusement. He's recently attained a remedial level of knowledge in philosophy to which he uses as a bludgeoning tool in discussions. Bell relies almost exclusively on the Kalam Cosmological Argument yet is unable to sufficiently connect it to the Christian god. This may be why he's now changed his theological position to somewhat of a nondescript theist.
