Difference between revisions of "Betty Van Velsen"

From Great Debate Community Wiki
imported>House Escalus
m
imported>House Escalus
m
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Member|image1 = Dc38df04-7223-4b61-bfbc-f4629f206fe0.jpg|gender = Female|positions/opinions = Flat Earther
{{Member|image1 = Dc38df04-7223-4b61-bfbc-f4629f206fe0.jpg|gender = Female|positions/opinions = Flat Earther


Young Earth Creationist|main_debating_focus = Heliocentrism, Evilution, Round Earth|skills = Being a dumb bitch}}Whenever she speaks, everyone on the entire ( slightly-irregular oblate spheroid) planet immediately has their IQ points dropped by a whopping 40pts.
Young-Earth Creationist|main_debating_focus = Heliocentrism


Betty is a uneducated bitch who constantly asks for things to be proven with the scientific method even when the scientific method is not even remotely applicable. The irony of this being is that she can´t even use the scientific method to demonstrate that the Earth is flat. Because you can´t use the scientific method for a What or an IS like flat Earth or spinning ball. She is making flawed observations or rigging the controls of the experiment in question... that is If she ever would get off her ass and do an experiment in the sodding first place.
Models
 
[[Evilution]]
 
The Round Earth|skills = Being a Dumb Bitch
 
 
Causing Everyone in a Debate Aftershow to Commit Mass Suicide via Shotguns to the Face}}Whenever she speaks, everyone on the entire (slightly-irregular oblate spheroid) planet immediately has their IQ points dropped by a whopping 40pts.
 
Betty is a uneducated bitch who constantly asks for things to be proven with the scientific method even when the scientific method is not even remotely applicable, the irony of this being is that she can´t even use the scientific method to demonstrate that the Earth is flat because you can't use the scientific method for a '''''What''''' or an '''''Is''''' like the flat Earth or a ''"spinning ball"''. She makes flawed observations or rigs the controls of an experiment... that is, if she ever would get off her ass and do an experiment in the sodding first place.


== Betty Vs Reds Rhetoric ==
== Betty Vs Reds Rhetoric ==
On June the 2nd 2017, Betty faced off against [[Reds Rhetoric]] in a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU debate] on what best describes observations: a spinning ball model or a flat Earth model. Betty however is sternly against models of any kind claiming that models are not scientific, and that they are not ever used when doing "real" science and failed to provide any type of flat Earth model that describes our observations of the sky. Her only attempt at even remotely providing a model was to claim that on a flat Earth we should be able to see the Southern Cross when we face south in Australia, South America and South Africa all at the same time due to perspective (a word that she used frivolously during the debate, but refused to define or describe).  
On June the 2nd 2017, Betty faced off against [[Reds Rhetoric]] in a [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU debate] on what best describes observations: a globe Earth model or a flat Earth model. Betty however, is sternly against models of any kind, claiming that models are not scientific, and that they are not ever used when doing "real" science, and therefore failed to provide any type of flat Earth model that describes or could predict our observations of the sky. Her only attempt at even remotely providing a model was to claim that, on a flat Earth we should be able to see the Southern Cross when we face south in Australia, South America, and South Africa all at the same time due to perspective (a word that she used frivolously during the debate, but refused to define, describe, or quantify).  


Meaning on a flat earth, you can see, the Southern Cross, when looking to the South in the Southern Hemisphere. Since this is what we actually see, this to Betty means we can be living on a a flat Earth ''"by default"''. Since she believes that, big bang, evolution, CMB, Redshift and Gravity are ''"just so stories"''.
She claimed that, on a flat Earth, that you could see the Southern Cross when looking to the South in the Southern Hemisphere (no shit). Since this is what we actually see, this means to Betty that we must be living on a a flat Earth, a "model" she considers to be the ''"default"'' position in regard to the shape of the Earth.


During the '''''3 hour long''' ''debate, the global mortality rate for all demographics increased by approximately 10.48% due to extreme facepalm impaction. This has led to Reds Rhetoric announcing to all that he would be releasing a new range of [https://youtu.be/Mh835unue5w?t=1m24s face pancaking] resistant oven mitts.
During the '''''3 hour long''' ''debate, the global mortality rate for all demographics increased by approximately 10.48% due to extreme facepalm impaction. This has led to Reds Rhetoric announcing to all that he would be releasing a new range of [https://youtu.be/Mh835unue5w?t=1m24s face pancaking] resistant oven mitts.
She also believes that the Big Bang, [[Evolution]], the CMB, Redshift, and Gravity are ''"just so stories"''.
[[Category:GDC Member]]
[[Category:GDC Member]]
[[Category:Flat Earthers]]
[[Category:Flat Earthers]]

Revision as of 06:49, 11 July 2017

Basic Description

<infobox>

 <title source="title1">
   <default>Betty Van Velsen</default>
 </title>
 <image source="image1">

</image> <group> <header>Information</header> <label>Gender</label> <label>Scientific Name</label> <label>Positions</label> <label>Debating Against</label> <label>Skills</label> <label>Links</label> </group> </infobox> Whenever she speaks, everyone on the entire (slightly-irregular oblate spheroid) planet immediately has their IQ points dropped by a whopping 40pts. Betty is a uneducated bitch who constantly asks for things to be proven with the scientific method even when the scientific method is not even remotely applicable, the irony of this being is that she can´t even use the scientific method to demonstrate that the Earth is flat because you can't use the scientific method for a What or an Is like the flat Earth or a "spinning ball". She makes flawed observations or rigs the controls of an experiment... that is, if she ever would get off her ass and do an experiment in the sodding first place.

Betty Vs Reds Rhetoric

On June the 2nd 2017, Betty faced off against Reds Rhetoric in a debate on what best describes observations: a globe Earth model or a flat Earth model. Betty however, is sternly against models of any kind, claiming that models are not scientific, and that they are not ever used when doing "real" science, and therefore failed to provide any type of flat Earth model that describes or could predict our observations of the sky. Her only attempt at even remotely providing a model was to claim that, on a flat Earth we should be able to see the Southern Cross when we face south in Australia, South America, and South Africa all at the same time due to perspective (a word that she used frivolously during the debate, but refused to define, describe, or quantify).

She claimed that, on a flat Earth, that you could see the Southern Cross when looking to the South in the Southern Hemisphere (no shit). Since this is what we actually see, this means to Betty that we must be living on a a flat Earth, a "model" she considers to be the "default" position in regard to the shape of the Earth.

During the 3 hour long debate, the global mortality rate for all demographics increased by approximately 10.48% due to extreme facepalm impaction. This has led to Reds Rhetoric announcing to all that he would be releasing a new range of face pancaking resistant oven mitts.

She also believes that the Big Bang, Evolution, the CMB, Redshift, and Gravity are "just so stories".