The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon - Revision history

imported>House Escalus: I have curtailed this congruous communiqué for a convenient conferee of any consignee crusading this chapter's confidence. :)

2017-10-20T01:46:24Z

I have curtailed this congruous communiqué for a convenient conferee of any consignee crusading this chapter's confidence. :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 20 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism\|TrueEmpiricism's]] belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone ~~in a debate~~ is a fallacy and should be avoided at all costs. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible... else it is a fallacy. ~~(fallacy of ''"egregia tum dicta"'')~~		The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon (aka ''"egregia tum dicta"'') is [[TrueEmpiricism\|TrueEmpiricism's]] belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone is a fallacy and should be avoided at all costs. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible... else it's a fallacy.
	[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>Steve McRae at 00:48, 20 October 2017

2017-10-20T00:48:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 20 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism\|TrueEmpiricism's]] belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone is a debate is a fallacy and should be avoided at all costs. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible... else it is a fallacy. (fallacy of ''"egregia tum dicta"'')		The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism\|TrueEmpiricism's]] belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone in a debate is a fallacy and should be avoided at all costs. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible... else it is a fallacy. (fallacy of ''"egregia tum dicta"'')
	[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>House Escalus at 13:52, 20 September 2017

2017-09-20T13:52:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 20 September 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism]]'s belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone is a debate is a fallacy and should be avoided at all ~~cost~~. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible...else it is a fallacy. (fallacy of egregia tum dicta)		The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism\|TrueEmpiricism's]] belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone is a debate is a fallacy and should be avoided at all costs. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible... else it is a fallacy. (fallacy of ''"egregia tum dicta"'')
	[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>Steve McRae: Steve McRae moved page The fallacy of prestigious jargon to The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon

2017-09-20T13:35:25Z

Steve McRae moved page The fallacy of prestigious jargon to The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:35, 20 September 2017
(No difference)

imported>Steve McRae: Added another phrase

2017-09-20T13:34:49Z

Added another phrase

New page

The Fallacy of Prestigious Jargon: [[TrueEmpiricism]]'s belief that using technical words properly in a conversation by someone is a debate is a fallacy and should be avoided at all cost. He does not outright say it, but he seems to maintain that people should use the most ambiguous, colloquial definitions possible...else it is a fallacy. (fallacy of egregia tum dicta)
[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]