Nesslig 20 - Revision history

imported>House Escalus: Much better...

2017-07-11T13:20:01Z

Much better...

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:20, 11 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Member\|title1 = Nesslig 20\|caption1 = Not Satan\|gender = Male\|positions/opinions = [[Evolution\|Evolutionary Biology]]\|main_debating_focus = Young Earth Creationists		{{Member\|title1 = Nesslig 20\|caption1 = Not Satan\|gender = Male\|positions/opinions = [[Evolution\|Evolutionary Biology]]\|main_debating_focus = Young Earth Creationists

	Flat Earthers\|skills = Finding Some Small Point of Contention and Making the Discussion Last for Weeks\|image1 = 9555devil.jpg}}[Start]		Flat Earthers\|skills = Finding Some Small Point of Contention and Making the Discussion Last for Weeks\|image1 = 9555devil.jpg}}Known to get cranky with people that are aggressively stupid or exceedingly persistent with silly ideas.

			[Start]

	== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==
	Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).		Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in [[Steve McRae\|Steve McRae's]] [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

	But we had a little bit discussion in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]		But we had a little bit discussion in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]

	(Discussion is on MrID's page and can be read there if one is interested or masochistic enough.)		(Discussion is on MrID's page and can be read there if one is interested or masochistic enough.)[[Category:GDC Member]]

	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

	One of many strengths of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.

	I understand Nesslig since he had no clue on the topic of ''intelligence'', thus, he cannot answer all my direct questions. I've been doing an online debate for almost 30 years in science, that is why I knew how to debate and discuss and knew how to win in any debate.

	I am hoping that Nesslig should continue our discussion and show me where I am wrong since if I'm wrong, Nesslig could help me (as promised) delete all my science books, and all my science videos and delete all my nonsense in science! He could even show to the world the real explanation of "intelligence", better than the new Intelligent Design <id>! Or delete his science and support the new Intelligent Design <id>.

	~~Below are the unanswered topics that we had discussed:~~

	~~'''Indirect Answer (IA) SUMMARY'''~~

	~~IA1. The topic is life and its course of change.~~

	~~IA2. The topic is the wrong usage of Natural Selection in scientific field.~~

	~~IA3. The topic is which is the scientific definition of ''intelligence''~~

	~~IA4. The topic is the categorization of all Xs and processes~~

	~~IA5. The topic is that ToE has no categorization method in science~~

	~~IA6. The topic is which model that could explain a broad topic in reality~~

	~~IA7. The topic is which model has a complete set of explanation from the origin of life to categorization of all Xs and all processes~~

	~~IA8. The topic is which is the specific meaning of ''intelligence''~~

	~~IA9. The topic is changing at will any variable or constant in both science and math~~

	~~IA10. The topic is the actual application of Natural Selection when explaining the flow of the river.~~

	~~IA11. The topic is the actual usage of ''random'' and ''non-random'' in reality~~

	~~IA12. The topic is ''life'' in biology for ''non-random'' and not gravity~~

	~~IA13. The topic is actual model for Biology to explain the whole reality in biological world. - from MrIntelligentDesign~~

	~~<nowiki> </nowiki>Known to get cranky with people that are aggressively stupid or exceedingly persistent with silly ideas.~~ [[Category:GDC Member]]

imported>House Escalus at 12:51, 11 July 2017

2017-07-11T12:51:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 11 July 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	But we had a little bit discussion in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]		But we had a little bit discussion in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]

			(Discussion is on MrID's page and can be read there if one is interested or masochistic enough.)

	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

imported>House Escalus at 12:47, 11 July 2017

2017-07-11T12:47:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:47, 11 July 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Member\|title1 = Nesslig 20\|caption1 = Not Satan\|gender = Male\|positions/opinions = Evolutionary Biology\|main_debating_focus = ~~YEC's, Flat Earthers\|skills = Finding some small point of contention and making the discussion last for weeks.\|image1 = 9555devil.jpg}}~~		== Basic Description ==
			{{Member\|title1 = Nesslig 20\|caption1 = Not Satan\|gender = Male\|positions/opinions = [[Evolution\|Evolutionary Biology]]\|main_debating_focus = Young Earth Creationists

	== ~~Basic Description ==~~		Flat Earthers\|skills = Finding Some Small Point of Contention and Making the Discussion Last for Weeks\|image1 = 9555devil.jpg}}[Start]

	== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==
	Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).		Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

	But we had a little bit discussion ~~(or debate, shall we say)~~ in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]		But we had a little bit discussion in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]

	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

imported>Formerly known as Nym: added the cranky bit :)

2017-07-07T23:29:40Z

added the cranky bit :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 7 July 2017
Line 44:		Line 44:
	IA12. The topic is ''life'' in biology for ''non-random'' and not gravity		IA12. The topic is ''life'' in biology for ''non-random'' and not gravity

	IA13. The topic is actual model for Biology to explain the whole reality in biological world. - from MrIntelligentDesign [[Category:GDC Member]]		IA13. The topic is actual model for Biology to explain the whole reality in biological world. - from MrIntelligentDesign

			<nowiki> </nowiki>Known to get cranky with people that are aggressively stupid or exceedingly persistent with silly ideas. [[Category:GDC Member]]

imported>Nesslig 20: The content under the description doesn't count as a description. Moved to the the next paragraph "Nesslig vs MrID in "evolution".

2017-07-07T13:51:25Z

The content under the description doesn't count as a description. Moved to the the next paragraph "Nesslig vs MrID in "evolution".

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 7 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Basic Description ==		== Basic Description ==
	Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

	But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - ~~from~~ [[MrIntelligentDesign]]		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==
			Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

			But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]

	~~== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==~~
	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

imported>House Escalus at 11:37, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T11:37:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 7 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Basic Description ==		== Basic Description ==
	Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve's GDC Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by Steve in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).		Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve McRae's [[GDC]] Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by [[Steve McRae\|Steve]] in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

	But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - from MrIntelligentDesign		But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - from [[MrIntelligentDesign]]

	== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ~~ToE~~" ==		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ''BiTs''" ==
	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

imported>MrIntelligentDesignn at 08:52, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T08:52:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 7 July 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

	One of many ~~strength~~ of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.		One of many strengths of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.

	I understand Nesslig since he had no clue on the topic of ''intelligence'', thus, he cannot answer all my direct questions. I've been doing an online debate for almost 30 years in science, that is why I knew how to debate and discuss and knew how to win in any debate.		I understand Nesslig since he had no clue on the topic of ''intelligence'', thus, he cannot answer all my direct questions. I've been doing an online debate for almost 30 years in science, that is why I knew how to debate and discuss and knew how to win in any debate.

imported>MrIntelligentDesignn at 08:51, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T08:51:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 7 July 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ToE" ==		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ToE" ==
	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it (Clarification 1). But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/MrIntelligentDesign#MrID_on_Evolution_.28Discussion.29 (Clarification 1)]. But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

	One of many strength of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.		One of many strength of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.

imported>MrIntelligentDesignn at 08:48, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T08:48:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 7 July 2017
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ToE" ==		== Nesslig vs MrID in "Evolution or ToE" ==
	When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in GDC Lexicon (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it (Clarification 1). But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.		When MrID had shared the science of the new Intelligent Design <id> about "evolution" in [http://great-debate-community.wikia.com/wiki/Evolution GDC Lexicon] (now could be read in MrID's profile, Nesslig had initially corrected (Correction 1) MrID's initial comments. Knowing that a fair science must have always a fair explanation, MrID had clarified it (Clarification 1). But MrID was surprised that Nesslig had corrected (Correction 2) them again. But since the topic is naturalistic science in where the topic is between models (and I am a discoverer in science), that is, ''evolution (ToE)'' vs ''interrelation (Biological Interrelation, BiTs)'', MrID had now used the explanatory power of the new Intelligent Design <id> to Nesslig's science when MrID had written the Clarification 2. But it turned out that Nesslig could never answer many direct questions with direct answers.

	One of many strength of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.		One of many strength of the new ''Intelligent Design <id>'' and the ''Biological Interrelation (BiTs)'' is in the topic of ''intelligence''. The topic of intelligence had shown in science almost all reality - it is superb and it is so powerful. The new <id> holds this discovery..nailed it..and explained it in details. This is where Nesslig had lost its science and lost its posture in the said discussion.

imported>MrIntelligentDesignn at 08:46, 7 July 2017

2017-07-07T08:46:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 7 July 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Basic Description ==		== Basic Description ==
	Although ~~MrId~~ (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve's GDC Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by Steve in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).		Although MrIntelligentDesign (Edgar) had a little time interacting with Nesslig in Steve's GDC Channel in G+, especially when MrID (me) was invited by Steve in his YouTube's channel, but I think that Nesslig is very knowledgeable in the topic of evolution and Theory of Evolution (ToE).

	But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - from MrIntelligentDesign		But we had a little bit discussion (or debate, shall we say) in GDC Wiki. - from MrIntelligentDesign