Creatheists - Revision history

47.145.45.131 at 15:48, 29 October 2017

2017-10-29T15:48:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 29 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Creatheists are [[Atheism\|~~Atheists~~]] who argue like Creationists. They are usually ex-Creationists (but not always) who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument, even if you take minimal time and even less brain-power to change the nouns in the premises.		Creatheists are [[Atheism\|atheists]] who argue like Creationists. They are usually ex-Creationists (but not always) who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument, even if you take minimal time and even less brain-power to change the nouns in the premises.

	Similarly, they don't understand that being an atheist doesn't inherently or necessarily make you any more logical, rational or informed than anyone else, as if belief in God is the ultimate litmus test for possessing sound rationale or objective thought. Creatheists tend to make very simple and/or flawed arguments against [[theism]], akin to Creationists trying argue that Piltdown-man refutes all of [[Evolution\|evolutionary theory]].		Similarly, they don't understand that being an atheist doesn't inherently or necessarily make you any more logical, rational or informed than anyone else, as if belief in God is the ultimate litmus test for possessing sound rationale or objective thought. Creatheists tend to make very simple and/or flawed arguments against [[theism]], akin to Creationists trying argue that Piltdown-man refutes all of [[Evolution\|evolutionary theory]].

imported>House Escalus at 01:53, 26 October 2017

2017-10-26T01:53:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 26 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Creatheists are [[Atheism\|Atheists]] who argue like Creationists. They are usually ex-Creationists (but not always) who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument, even if you take minimal time and even less brain-power to change the nouns in premises.		Creatheists are [[Atheism\|Atheists]] who argue like Creationists. They are usually ex-Creationists (but not always) who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument, even if you take minimal time and even less brain-power to change the nouns in the premises.

	Similarly, they don't understand that being an atheist doesn't inherently or necessarily make you any more logical, rational or informed than anyone else, as if belief in God is the ultimate litmus test for possessing sound rationale or objective thought. Creatheists tend to make very simple and/or flawed arguments against [[theism]], akin to Creationists trying argue that Piltdown-man refutes all of [[Evolution\|evolutionary theory]].		Similarly, they don't understand that being an atheist doesn't inherently or necessarily make you any more logical, rational or informed than anyone else, as if belief in God is the ultimate litmus test for possessing sound rationale or objective thought. Creatheists tend to make very simple and/or flawed arguments against [[theism]], akin to Creationists trying argue that Piltdown-man refutes all of [[Evolution\|evolutionary theory]].

	== Typical Examples ==		== Typical Examples ==
	"[[God]] is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!"		"[[God]] is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!"

	"Philosophy doesn't prove anything." (Which is the Creatheist analogue of ''"[[evilution]] is just a theory"''.)[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		"Philosophy doesn't prove anything." (Which is the Creatheist analogue of ''"[[evilution]] is just a theory"''.)
			[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>House Escalus at 01:52, 26 October 2017

2017-10-26T01:52:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 26 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Creatheists ==		Creatheists are [[Atheism\|Atheists]] who argue like Creationists. They are usually ex-Creationists (but not always) who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument, even if you take minimal time and even less brain-power to change the nouns in premises.

	~~Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually~~ they ~~are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven~~'t ~~figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument and~~ that being an atheist doesn't inherently make you logical, rational or informed. Creatheists tend to ~~run~~ very simple arguments against theism akin to ~~creationists~~ trying argue that Piltdown refutes all of evolutionary theory. Typical example: "God is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!" or "philosophy doesn't prove anything," which is the creatheist analogue to "evolution is just a theory."		Similarly, they don't understand that being an atheist doesn't inherently or necessarily make you any more logical, rational or informed than anyone else, as if belief in God is the ultimate litmus test for possessing sound rationale or objective thought. Creatheists tend to make very simple and/or flawed arguments against [[theism]], akin to Creationists trying argue that Piltdown-man refutes all of [[Evolution\|evolutionary theory]].

	[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		== Typical Examples ==
			"[[God]] is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!"

			"Philosophy doesn't prove anything." (Which is the Creatheist analogue of ''"[[evilution]] is just a theory"''.)[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>Steve McRae at 09:08, 25 October 2017

2017-10-25T09:08:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 25 October 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Creatheists ==		== Creatheists ==

	Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually they are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument and that being an atheist doesn't inherently make you logical, rational or informed. Creatheists tend to run very simple arguments against theism akin to creationists trying argue that Piltdown refutes all of evolutionary theory. Typical example: "God is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!".		Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually they are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument and that being an atheist doesn't inherently make you logical, rational or informed. Creatheists tend to run very simple arguments against theism akin to creationists trying argue that Piltdown refutes all of evolutionary theory. Typical example: "God is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!" or "philosophy doesn't prove anything," which is the creatheist analogue to "evolution is just a theory."

	[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]		[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]

imported>Steve McRae: Created page with "== Creatheists == Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually they are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument ..."

2017-10-25T00:51:33Z

Created page with "== Creatheists == Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually they are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument ..."

New page

== Creatheists ==

Atheist who argue like creationists. Usually they are ex-creationists, but not always, who still haven't figured out that a bad argument is a bad argument and that being an atheist doesn't inherently make you logical, rational or informed. Creatheists tend to run very simple arguments against theism akin to creationists trying argue that Piltdown refutes all of evolutionary theory. Typical example: "God is supernatural, the supernatural doesn't exist, therefore God does not exist!".
[[Category:GDC Lexicon]]